Consent to Settle
Consent to settle is a policy provision requiring the insurer to get the insured's agreement before settling a claim. It is common in professional liability policies and is often paired with a hammer clause that penalizes an insured who refuses.
Last updated October 13, 2026
How consent to settle works
Under many liability policies, the insurer controls the defense and settlement. In professional, management and some cyber policies, the insured's reputation is also at stake, so the policy says the insurer will not settle without the insured's consent. The insured may accept, or may refuse and take the case forward.
The two ideas are related but not identical. Consent to settle describes the insured's right to approve. A hammer clause describes what happens if the insured refuses a settlement the insurer recommends. Not every consent provision includes a hammer.
Common hammer variations
Labels such as hard and soft vary from source to source, so focus on the mechanics in the policy itself.
- Full hammer: if the insured refuses, the insurer's responsibility is typically capped at the amount the claim could have settled for, plus covered costs to that point, and later defense costs and damages fall on the insured.
- Coinsurance hammer: after a refusal, the insurer and insured share later costs in stated percentages, such as 80/20 or 50/50.
- Pure consent: the insurer needs consent, with no financial penalty for declining.
Example
An insurer recommends settling a claim for $300,000. The insured, worried about reputation, refuses. Later the case ends with $700,000 in damages and further defense fees. Under a full hammer, the insurer's share is typically limited to the $300,000 figure plus covered costs incurred up to the refusal, and the insured pays the difference. Under a coinsurance hammer, the extra costs would be split by the stated percentages.
What to watch for
- Read exactly how the clause is worded, since "consent" can hide a hard, soft or no hammer.
- Ask whether the insurer must give a written settlement recommendation before the clause applies.
- Check whether the clause covers only the insurer's payment of damages or also defense costs.
- Talk to counsel before refusing a recommended settlement, and understand how a reservation of rights may interact with it.
Consent to settle vs. related terms
- Consent to settle vs. the insurer's right to settle. Some liability policies, including many general liability forms, let the insurer settle a claim at its own discretion. Consent to settle reverses that: the insurer needs the insured's agreement first.
- Consent to settle vs. hammer clause. Consent is the right to approve. The hammer is the financial consequence of refusing a settlement the insurer recommends.
- The reverse rule. Most liability policies also bar the insured from settling, admitting liability or agreeing to pay without the insurer's consent. If the insured settles alone, the insurer may refuse to reimburse the payment. Consent runs in both directions.
- Consent to settle vs. reservation of rights. A reservation of rights says the insurer may still contest coverage. It does not give the insured a veto, but it changes the conversation about who funds a settlement and on what terms.
- Consent to settle vs. allocation. Allocation decides how a settlement or defense bill is split between covered and uncovered parts of a claim. Consent decides who approves the deal itself.
Second example: a coinsurance hammer
A hypothetical software company has a professional liability policy with an 80/20 coinsurance hammer. The insurer recommends settling a customer claim for $200,000. The company declines because it wants to defend its product's reputation. The case continues, and later the damages and additional defense costs total $400,000 beyond the recommended figure. Under a typical 80/20 wording, the insurer pays the $200,000 it recommended plus 80% of the later $400,000, which is $320,000, and the company pays the remaining 20%, or $80,000, subject to the policy limit and retention. Under a full hammer, the company could have owed all $400,000. Under pure consent with no hammer, the insurer would have continued to pay as usual. Wording varies by policy.
Questions to ask your broker or underwriter
- Does the policy require my consent to settle, or can the insurer settle on its own?
- Is there a hammer clause, and is it a full hammer or a percentage split? What percentage?
- Does the hammer apply to later defense costs as well as damages?
- Must the insurer give a written settlement recommendation before the clause is triggered?
- Is my consent required to be reasonable, or can I decline for any reason?
- If I want to settle on my own, what consent do I need from the insurer first?
- Can the hammer be softened or removed at renewal, and what would that cost?
Why it matters for technology, AI, fintech and digital-asset companies
Founders and executives may want to fight a claim to protect a product or brand. Consent provisions in errors and omissions and D&O policies determine how much financial risk they take on by doing so.
Founders often want to fight claims that touch product quality, security or integrity, and a settlement may include confidentiality or admission terms they dislike. Regulatory and investor disputes can also have reputational effects that a pure dollar comparison misses. In AI and digital-asset businesses, a settlement can be read by customers and regulators as a signal about the technology itself. That makes the wording of consent and hammer provisions in E&O, D&O and cyber policies worth reading before a claim arrives. See cyber and technology E&O for how those policies are usually structured.
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What is consent to settle?
Consent to settle is a policy provision requiring the insurer to get the insured's agreement before settling a claim. It is common in professional liability policies and is often paired with a hammer clause that penalizes an insured who refuses.
What is the difference between consent to settle and a hammer clause?
Consent to settle gives the insured the right to approve or reject a settlement. A hammer clause adds a financial consequence if the insured rejects a settlement the insurer recommends, typically limiting the insurer's later payments. Some policies require consent without any hammer.
Do all liability policies have a consent to settle clause?
No. Consent provisions are most common in professional liability, management liability and similar policies. Some policies give the insurer the right to settle without the insured's agreement. Whether consent is required, and any penalty for refusing, depends on the specific policy wording.
What is a coinsurance (soft) hammer clause?
A coinsurance hammer, sometimes called a soft hammer, says that if the insured refuses a recommended settlement, later costs are shared between insurer and insured in stated percentages, such as 80/20. Some sources use the labels soft and hard differently, so read the wording. A full hammer can shift all later costs to the insured.
Can an insurer settle a claim without my consent?
It depends on the policy. Some liability forms let the insurer settle at its discretion, while many professional, management and cyber liability policies require the insured's consent. Check the settlement clause in the policy, along with any hammer clause that applies if you refuse.
Can I settle a claim on my own without the insurer?
Usually not safely. Most liability policies bar the insured from voluntarily settling or admitting liability without the insurer's consent, and an insurer may refuse to reimburse a settlement it did not approve. Talk to your broker and counsel before making any offer.
Does consent to settle apply to cyber and D&O insurance?
Often yes. Consent provisions are common in professional liability, D&O, E&O and cyber policies, where the insured has reputational or regulatory interests. The exact wording, and whether a hammer clause applies, differs by insurer and form.
Why do insurers add a hammer clause?
It encourages the insured to accept reasonable settlements. Without it, an insured could refuse a recommended deal and leave the insurer exposed to higher defense costs and damages. A hammer ties the insurer's later exposure to the figure it recommended. Terms and percentages vary.
Need this coverage, or just a clear answer?
Our brokers translate terms like Consent to Settle into a program built for how your company actually operates, and read every policy for the exclusions that matter.
Book a consultation → (opens in a new tab)