Allocation
Allocation is the process of dividing a loss, such as defense costs or a settlement, between the part a policy covers and the part it does not, for example when a claim involves uninsured parties or uncovered allegations.
Last updated October 13, 2026
How allocation works
A policy pays only for covered loss. When one lawsuit or settlement mixes covered and uncovered elements, someone has to decide how much of the total belongs to each. That exercise is allocation. It comes up most often in management, professional and cyber-related liability policies, where a single claim may name several defendants or plead several theories at once.
Typical triggers include:
- A lawsuit names an insured person and a party the policy does not cover, such as a company that lacks entity coverage.
- A complaint mixes covered allegations with excluded ones, such as intentional misconduct.
- A settlement or judgment resolves covered and uncovered claims together.
- One law firm defends insured and uninsured defendants at the same time.
How policies and courts approach it
Many policies include an allocation clause that tells the insurer and the insured to use good-faith efforts to agree on a fair split. If the wording is silent or the parties disagree, courts in different states use different tests. One example is the "reasonably related" rule, which the Ninth Circuit has treated as the default for D&O defense costs: costs reasonably related to defending insured parties are covered even if they also help uninsured ones. Other approaches compare each party's relative exposure. Which test applies depends on the policy wording and the governing law.
Example
A company and its chief executive are sued together over a disputed contract. The policy covers the executive but not the company, and total legal fees reach $400,000. The insurer and the insured negotiate what share of that work reasonably relates to defending the executive. The company pays the rest. If the company had entity coverage, little or no split might be needed.
Allocation vs. related terms
- Reservation of rights. A reservation of rights is the insurer's notice that it may later contest coverage. Allocation is how a loss is divided between covered and uncovered parts. The two often appear together, because an insurer may reserve rights on how defense costs or a settlement should be split.
- Duty to defend. The duty to defend is the obligation to provide a defense when a claim is potentially covered. In some places and under some policies, a covered allegation can bring the whole suit within the defense obligation, while other policies allow the insurer to split defense costs. Wording and law decide which applies.
- Consent to settle and the hammer clause. Settlement terms matter to allocation, because a lump sum may resolve covered and uncovered claims together. See consent to settle and the hammer clause for how settlement decisions can shape what the policy pays.
- Defense costs and indemnity. Defense costs and damages or settlements can be allocated differently, and policies may treat them under separate clauses.
A second example: allocating a lump-sum settlement
A hypothetical startup, its chief executive and a former contractor are named in one lawsuit that settles for a single lump sum. Some claims target the executive for alleged wrongful acts, which the policy covers. Other claims target the company for breach of contract, which the policy excludes, and the contractor is not an insured. The insurer and the insured must agree on how much of the settlement resolves covered claims against the insured individuals. They consider the policy's allocation clause, which allegations drove settlement value and the relative exposure of each defendant. If they agree that two thirds relates to covered claims, the insurer would pay that share, subject to the retention and limit, and the company would bear the rest.
What to watch for
- Confirm whether the company itself is an insured, and for which types of claims.
- Read the allocation clause, and ask whether defense costs are advanced while allocation is still being debated.
- Check how settlements involving uncovered parties or uncovered claims are treated.
- Keep clear records of who worked on what, since the split often turns on that detail.
Why it matters for technology, AI, fintech and digital-asset companies
Lawsuits against venture-backed companies commonly name the company alongside founders, directors and officers. Whether the entity is an insured under the D&O policy can change how much allocation is needed, so it is worth confirming when the program is placed.
Questions to ask your broker or underwriter
- Does the policy have an allocation clause, and what standard does it use: best efforts, relative exposure, reasonably related or a fixed percentage?
- Is the company itself an insured, and for which claims? See entity coverage.
- Are defense costs advanced while allocation is still being discussed?
- How are disputes about allocation resolved?
- Does the insurer need to consent to a settlement, and what happens if the parties disagree on its terms?
- How does the policy define covered loss and wrongful acts, since those definitions decide what is left to allocate?
Common mistakes
- Raising allocation only at settlement. It is better to understand the clause when the policy is placed and at the start of a claim.
- Thin records. The split often turns on who did what work, so time entries and task descriptions matter.
- One firm, many clients, no plan. If one law firm defends insured and uninsured parties, decide early how its work will be tracked.
- Assuming entity coverage is automatic. Entity coverage can be limited to particular claim types, and the policy wording controls.
- Overlooking uninsured parties. Investors, affiliates, contractors and other defendants may not be insureds.
How allocation shows up for fast-growing companies
Venture-backed companies tend to be sued alongside founders, directors, officers and sometimes investors, in a single complaint with several theories. How the Side A, B and C coverage parts apply, and who counts as an insured, decides how much allocation is needed. See directors and officers liability and employment practices liability, where employment claims commonly name both the company and individual managers. Startup insurance by stage describes how these programs are usually built.
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
What is allocation in insurance?
Allocation is the process of dividing a loss, such as defense costs or a settlement, between the part a policy covers and the part it does not, for example when a claim involves uninsured parties or uncovered allegations.
When does allocation come up in a D&O or professional liability claim?
It usually arises when a claim names both insured and uninsured defendants, pleads covered and excluded allegations together, or ends in a combined settlement. The insurer then pays only the portion attributable to covered loss, and the policy wording and governing law shape how that portion is measured.
Who decides how a loss is allocated?
Often the policy directs the insurer and insured to work together, using good-faith efforts to agree on a fair split. If they cannot agree, the dispute may be resolved through negotiation, arbitration or a court applying the tests recognized in that jurisdiction.
Can entity coverage reduce allocation disputes?
Often, yes. When the company is itself an insured for the claim, its defense costs and its share of a settlement are not automatically outside the policy, so there is less uninsured loss to separate out. The scope of entity coverage varies by policy.
What is a predetermined allocation clause?
It is a policy provision that sets a fixed split of covered and uncovered loss, often for particular types of claims, instead of leaving the percentage to negotiation after the fact. Whether a policy has one, and what percentages it uses, depends on the form.
How can a company prepare for an allocation discussion?
Read the allocation clause before a claim, and when one arrives keep detailed records of work by defendant and by claim. Share the complaint with your broker early, since which allegations are covered often shapes the split.
What happens to defense costs while allocation is disputed?
It depends on the policy. Some policies advance defense costs for covered insureds while the split is worked out, and others pay only after the parties agree. Ask about advancement when the policy is placed.
Does allocation apply to property or other first-party claims?
It is most associated with liability policies, where one claim mixes covered and uncovered parties or allegations. First-party policies can raise a similar issue when a loss has both covered and excluded causes, and the policy wording decides how that is treated.
Need this coverage, or just a clear answer?
Our brokers translate terms like Allocation into a program built for how your company actually operates, and read every policy for the exclusions that matter.
Book a consultation → (opens in a new tab)